Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Fiona Ferro vs Helene Scholsen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ferro vs Scholsen analysis and find out who is favored!
Fiona Ferro vs Helene Scholsen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ferro 1 - 0 Scholsen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ferro has won 49.15% of points on their second serve, while Scholsen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ferro, in recent form, has won 57.03% of their opponent's second serve points, while Scholsen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.96% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ferro has saved 53.39% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Scholsen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ferro has won 54.1% of matches played (W/L 33/ 28), with Scholsen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ferro has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 202/ 133), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9). Scholsen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 95/ 61), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 49% (W/L 34/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Ferro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.7% of matches (W/L 27/ 19), where as Scholsen has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ferro winning 1 times and Scholsen being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ferro winning 2 and Scholsen winning 1. The last match between Ferro and Scholsen was at the Braunschweig, 24-08-2017, Second, Clay with Fiona Ferro getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ferro and Scholsen have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ferro winning 1 times and Scholsen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ferro winning 0, and Scholsen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ferro has played against opponents with an average rank of 245.28 while Scholsen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ferro has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Scholsen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ferro has converted 45.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Scholsen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
126
Rank
39
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
350
High
28
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
55% (308-248)
Career Total W/L
58% (246-181)
48% (13-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,402,647
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Fiona Ferro | Helene Scholsen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:15:0 | 2:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (53/75) | 67% (54/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (33/53) | 48% (26/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 36% (8/22) | 41% (11/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 50% (5/10) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (44/81) | 45% (34/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Fiona Ferro
Player
Helene Scholsen
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Fiona Ferro | Helene Scholsen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (13/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (37/30) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (312/298) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 36% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 56 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:11 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 266.04 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1326/2028) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (792/1326) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (345/702) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (111/246) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (902/2008) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (13/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 15% (2/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (17/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (17/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Fiona Ferro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Fiona Ferro
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Fiona Ferro
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
56 of
85)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Erika Andreeva
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Fiona Ferro
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Cristina Bucsa
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Fiona Ferro
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alize Cornet
Player
Fiona Ferro
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
30%
(
8 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Lauren Davis
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Timofeeva
Player
Fiona Ferro
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
75%
(
67 of
89)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Fiona Ferro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Helene Scholsen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-7(7) 6-1 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ines Murta
Player
Helene Scholsen
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Helene Scholsen
Player
Anastasia Zolotareva
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
52%
(
35 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Helene Scholsen
51%
(
48 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
78 of
130)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
61 of
130)
117
Total Points Won
107
|
2-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Helene Scholsen
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ferro Vs Scholsen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Fiona Ferro
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
